Rushdie, Charlie Hebdo, and Me

je suis deloquix

 

I’ve been reading peoples’ reactions to the Charlie Hebdo Affair in the media and on Facebook. There is a lot of soul searching going on about what is the appropriate response to the horrendous act and what is the proper way for people to express solidarity and outrage. For me, this is of more than a casual interest. As many of you know, my bookstore was bombed in 1989, presumably because  we were carrying Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses. As best as I can tell, we were the first victim of Islamic terrorism in the United States. No one was killed, because the pipe bomb that was thrown through the window didn’t go off. But had it not been defective, it would have killed everyone in the store.

 

Much of the public pronouncements that were being made then  are being made again now in the international conversation about Charlie Hebdo. How do we respond to threats against freedom of speech? How can we best express our solidarity? How should government protect the people against terrorists in general and Islamic terrorists and Jihadists, in particular? What is the responsibility of the broader Islamic community and the Islamic religion in permitting these acts to occur? How much, if at all, should we be profiling Moslems as potentially dangerous? What should mainstream Moslem leaders do about  denouncing these acts? Is Islam a uniquely violent religion that is the true source of Jihadism?

 

Of course, the comments of right wingers, conservative politicians, and Fox News pundits are pretty much what we would expect. For them, this is an opportunity to wage a holy war against Islam. It also vindicates their contempt of the cowardly French and allows them to fulminate against liberals, Obama, Al Sharpton, and the United Nations. We need not waste time commenting on this.

 

Alan Dershowitz gave a particularly tasteless interview asserting that France was reaping what it had sown, and went on to view the entire affair from the prism of  what it all means for Israel.

 

A lot of people along the entire political spectrum are arguing that  it’s the responsibility of  all  Islamic people to denounce this act and it is particularly the responsibility of Islamic leaders to denounce it in language sufficiently strong to satisfy…..something and someone.

 

During the Rushdie Affair,  people in the literary world made eloquent pronouncements about how they  would risk their lives for freedom of speech. Most of these people didn’t have much skin in the game and were not likely to have an opportunity to risk much of anything. It was quite different for those of us at Cody’s. After the bomb squad detonated the bomb, we all met in the store and took a vote about whether we should keep carrying the book. The staff voted unanimously to continue selling it.

 

But the media and many public voices wanted more than that.  The media was looking for sound bites. Every newsperson I spoke with challenged me to put the book in the window. (I didn’t, and I didn’t put it on the front table either). Most of them wanted me to make grandiloquent public pronouncements about how we were willing to be martyrs for freedom of speech. (“Ayatollah Khomeini, read…my…lips”). I didn’t do that either. I decided that under the circumstances, discretion was the better part of valor. No interviews to the media, no manifestoes about freedom of speech in the front window. We just quietly kept selling the book.

 

I have no problem telling you today that I had no intention of being a martyr, that I was not willing to die for The First Amendment, and I certainly wasn’t willing to put my employees in harm’s way to make  a public point. People treated us like heroes for selling the book, and they still do. But honestly, if as a result of our selling it, my employees were killed. I would not be proud of our decision  at all. I would have thought it was reckless, not heroic.

 

I’ve been thinking a lot about Islamic leaders and clerics and what they should be doing.  I think it’s fine if they want to denounce the act, if they want to point out that almost all of the 1.6 billion followers of Islam are not Jihadists. Even if they want to apologize. That’s their choice but not their responsibility. What I would like to see them do is to engage potential future Jihadists in a way that would get them to calm down. But doing so would require considerable discretion.

 

For me then and I imagine for them now, the decisions just aren’t that easy. And we should be respectful of that fact.

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

13 Responses to “Rushdie, Charlie Hebdo, and Me”

  1. cotatikid Says:

    I appreciate your candor, thank you for sharing a bit of history…

  2. A.K.Andrew @artyyah Says:

    Thanks for an excellent post on a difficult subject. I’d forgotten about the attack on Cody’s- do it must doubly difficult for you to read of the events this week. It was a tough call for you or any of us to make, but standing up for freedom of speech has to be our first call, otherwise the terrorist have indeed won. I appreciated your call for action within the Islamic community too, by people who hopefully may have some influence.

  3. Teresa Burns Gunther Says:

    Hi Andy,

    Well said! In this country we seem incapable of having intelligent conversation about complex issues that require wisdom, civility, intelligence and compassion. Instead “debate” is loud and one sided; people point figures, shout inanities and malign. Thanks for being a voice of reason in all the noise.

    All best, Teresa (We met at Taos writers conference in New Mexico last summer.)

    Teresa Burns Gunther 525 Bellevue Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 teresa@teresaburnsgunther.com http://www.teresaburnsgunther.com

    >

  4. R J Madigan Says:

    Hi Andy. Really enjoy reading your blog. Hope to see you at my brand new site http://www.swordofair.net. Check,out the trailer for my new multitouch iBook The Sword of Air.
    Video for youtube sword of air► 1:54► 1:54
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNHf2nCW7nc
    9 Nov 2014 – Uploaded by iBook Sword of Air
    The stunning new multi-touch iBook from breakthrough author R.J.Madigan. Available now on …

    Thanks

    Rae

  5. Ehsaneh Says:

    Thank you for this beautiful post. As an Iranian-American Atheist of both Muslim and Mormon descent what worries me is how often the media tries to use religious and ethnic identity labels as shortcuts to explaining who people are. But there is still only one way of getting to know someone and that is by hearing their story. Thank you for sharing yours and for reminding us that it might not be that different from that of Muslim leaders trying to decide how to respond to this horrific event.

  6. Susan Mary Malone Says:

    Truly appreciate your post, Andy. In all the insane clash of words over this, it’s so nice to read a balanced view. We all have to deal with this in publishing. One of my authors now has a great dystopian novel dealing with Islamic themes, and in fear she’s changing it to delete any inferences to Islam. I understand, but do hate that sort of self-censorship . . .

  7. colin brezicki Says:

    Your post strikes that evasive balance between freedom and responsibility. So many people leap on the bandwagon of “je suis” without understanding that they haven’t paid for their ticket. The price is high, as you and your colleagues at your bookstore discovered. Thank you for a very moving reminder of the sacrifices others make for the freedoms we take for granted.

  8. Pizzos3.com Says:

    This is a very thoughtful reaction to a horrendous act, promoting a subtle viewpoint honoring balance which I believe you feel is needed in responding to this level of violence and terrorism. However I would be remiss to not mention that throughout the reading of this posting my reflections turned toward the 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing which killed four sweet little African American girls because of race. We know the hatred based on race is not far removed from the hatred based on religion. Would this act be viewed as terrorism in America today when it wasn’t only 50 short years ago? And what about the posture of so many Americans who kept quietly living their lives in contrast of those who did and still today angrily protests these acts. The choice is difficult and sad that they’re necessary.

    • andyrossagency Says:

      Dear Pizzos3, thanks for your comment. Definitely worth thinking about. I lived in Atlanta back then and saw the Ku Klux Klan picketing my dad’s store. Too many people were silent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: